32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO'06)
DOI: 10.1109/euromicro.2006.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the Art and Practice of OpenSource Component Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical success factor in CBSD is the selection of appropriate OSS products, and both researchers and industry have proposed a variety of OSS evaluation and selection methods [18]. However, studies have also shown that practitioners typically do not use these "normative" selection methods [19,20]. Hauge et al observed a first fit rather than a best fit strategy [19].…”
Section: Component-based Development With Open Source Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A critical success factor in CBSD is the selection of appropriate OSS products, and both researchers and industry have proposed a variety of OSS evaluation and selection methods [18]. However, studies have also shown that practitioners typically do not use these "normative" selection methods [19,20]. Hauge et al observed a first fit rather than a best fit strategy [19].…”
Section: Component-based Development With Open Source Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merilinna and Matinlassi investigated the state of the art and practice of OSS integration [20]; while they did not specifically focus on SA, they found that architectural mismatch was either preempted by selection of OSS components from a list of "fluently integrating" components, or that practitioners were not aware of the concept of architectural mismatch.…”
Section: Software Architecture In Open Source Software Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both studies on COTS and OSS conclude that even though there are successful applications of normative selection methods for both COTS and OSS, such methods are rarely applied in practice [16,19,22,28]. Moreover, these studies conclude that practitioners use ad hoc, manual, and developer dependent methods for selection of components.…”
Section: Normative Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the view that using the right software is critical to project success [31], software engineering researchers have focused their attention on developing normative methods for selecting OSS components [1,20,24,27]. While successful applications of such methods have been reported, research shows that component selection in practice is ad hoc and developer dependent [16,19,22,28]. Beyond sweeping statements about the prevalence of ad hoc and developer dependent selection methods, little is known about what software developers actually do when selecting OSS components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although research and practitioners have proposed a diverse set of methods and evaluation guidelines for supporting components selection (e.g., [16,17,19]), these proposals have not been widely adopted in the industrial practice [15]. The literature presents various possible explanations for this: that the proposed methods are failing to deal with identification of components and information for evaluating them [4,6], and that it is impractical to perform complete evaluations in terms of time and cost [12].…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%