1986
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(86)91024-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-of-the-art efficiency determination for a Si(Li) X-ray detector in the 3–40 keV energy range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy calibration was performed using X and γ -rays from an 241 Am radioactive source [66,67]. The source was separated from the crystal by a PTFE sheet in between as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Energy Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy calibration was performed using X and γ -rays from an 241 Am radioactive source [66,67]. The source was separated from the crystal by a PTFE sheet in between as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Energy Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy and origin of each peak were identified and summarized in Table 2, based on Ref. [66] and the Table of Radioactive Isotopes [67]. The energy resolution achieved here is very similar to that of a typical NaI(Tl) detector at room temperature [68].…”
Section: Energy Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, an obvious and direct way to deal with calibrating a PIXE system is to undertake highly accurate, direct measurements of the absolute or relative efficiency. Formerly, we did extensive work of this type using radionuclide standards, but this is expensive and does not help sufficiently with the region below 5 keV that is now of major importance in our current work on major elements in geological materials . Efficiency measurements with synchrotron radiation have been extremely successful, but very few PIXE laboratories have access to synchrotron facilities.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have modelled the full shape of the fluorescence lines, including the low-energy tails as well as the high-energy tail contributions from the escape of Auger electrons and photoelectrons. Primary photon energies above the L 1 absorption edge of gold were used in other reported measurements [6,4,7], but we used also energies between the L 3 and L 2 edges in order to eliminate the uncertainties from quantities related to the individual L subshells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%