“…In addition, the THA patient population is becoming younger, more active, and more obese, and subsequently placing higher demands on the prosthesis and specifically the bearing surface [3]. Alternative bearings in THA have been developed in an attempt to reduce wear-related issues and improve implant longevity [4].Recent bearing surface combinations include metal-on-polyethylene (MOP) and ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) with cross-linked polyethylene [5], ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) [6,7], ceramic-on-metal (COM) [4] and metal-on-metal (MOM). Legitimate concerns with MOM bearing couples including ion production and adverse local tissue reactions have led to a drastic reduction in the usage of metal liners [8,9].…”