2015
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the art of leadless pacing

Abstract: Despite undisputable benefits, conventional pacemaker therapy is associated with specific complications related to the subcutaneous device and the transvenous leads. Recently, two miniaturized leadless pacemakers, Nanostim™ (St. Jude Medical) and Micra™ (Medtronic), which can be completely implanted inside the right ventricle using steerable delivery systems, entered clinical application. The WiCS™-cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) system (wireless cardiac stimulation for CRT, EBR Systems) delivers leadl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, main components of current pacemakers are still the same of the first cardiac pacemaker type, such as a pulse generator and one or more transvenous leads. This design usually causes some shortterm and long-term complications (in approximately 10% of patients) [4,20]. The subcutaneous pocket is very prone to local infections and often causes skin erosion and hematoma inside the implantation region [20].…”
Section: Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker (Lcp) As a New Minimal Invasive Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, main components of current pacemakers are still the same of the first cardiac pacemaker type, such as a pulse generator and one or more transvenous leads. This design usually causes some shortterm and long-term complications (in approximately 10% of patients) [4,20]. The subcutaneous pocket is very prone to local infections and often causes skin erosion and hematoma inside the implantation region [20].…”
Section: Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker (Lcp) As a New Minimal Invasive Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This design usually causes some shortterm and long-term complications (in approximately 10% of patients) [4,20]. The subcutaneous pocket is very prone to local infections and often causes skin erosion and hematoma inside the implantation region [20]. In addition, implantation procedures of this regular pacemaker also have several risks.…”
Section: Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker (Lcp) As a New Minimal Invasive Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations