2010
DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e32834066b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the art on the research for biomarkers allowing individual, tailor-made minimization of immunosuppression

Abstract: With the recent findings we have gained a better understanding of operational tolerant patients and have identified biomarkers and assays which will be very helpful when guiding partial or complete immunosuppressive minimization. For the future, collaborative efforts are needed to design and perform prospective multicenter trials to validate the identified biomarkers across different laboratories and laboratory platforms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the monitoring of CD4 + lymphocyte adenosine triphosphate levels has been suggested as an alternative means of assessing the net state of immunosuppression,10 although others have suggested that the utility of this assay is its ability to better identify recipients who are more susceptible to infection‐related complications 11. Clearly, specific and meaningful biomarkers are needed to assess individual risks for immunological complications 12, 13. Although immunosuppression minimization has been shown to reduce the complications of chronic immunosuppression,14, 15 only a minority of LT recipients are able to achieve complete withdrawal,16 and this means that the majority of patients likely will remain on chronic immunosuppression for their entire lives.…”
Section: Concepts In Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the monitoring of CD4 + lymphocyte adenosine triphosphate levels has been suggested as an alternative means of assessing the net state of immunosuppression,10 although others have suggested that the utility of this assay is its ability to better identify recipients who are more susceptible to infection‐related complications 11. Clearly, specific and meaningful biomarkers are needed to assess individual risks for immunological complications 12, 13. Although immunosuppression minimization has been shown to reduce the complications of chronic immunosuppression,14, 15 only a minority of LT recipients are able to achieve complete withdrawal,16 and this means that the majority of patients likely will remain on chronic immunosuppression for their entire lives.…”
Section: Concepts In Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have shown therapeutic effects in treating autoimmune disease such as type 1 diabetes (T1D) [9, 10•, 11••, 12], GvHD after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSC) [8, 13•, 14••, 15] and also preventing rejection of solid organ transplants [3,7,16]. In some studies, higher proportions of Tregs or certain subsets were detected in the peripheral blood of Boperationally tolerant^patients [17,18] with their frequencies or numbers being reduced in some patients experiencing rejection [18,19]. In addition, Tregs can impose regulatory function onto conventional alloreactive T cells in a process now being known as infectious tolerance [16,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, modern transplantation medicine is moving away from the exploration of novel immunosuppressive agents toward the induction of allograft tolerance in organ recipients. It causes a pressing need to search for unique tolerance biomarkers as surrogate endpoints of immunosuppressive strategies, or measures for predicting successful tolerance induction [2, 3]. Recipients with graft tolerance retain well-functioning grafts after cessation of immunosuppressive regimens, referred to as operational tolerance [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%