2008
DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pon003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Personhood in Ontological Security Theories of International Relations and Chinese Nationalism: A Sceptical View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Herman notes how our sense of safety and trust is acquired early in life and forms the basis of our systems of relationship and belief, but trauma can undermine these core belief systems and 'cast the victim into a state of existential crisis' (Herman 1992, 51). The state itself, and our ascription of legitimacy in it, is especially important to the maintenance of ontological security (Krolikowski 2008). Zhukova (2016, 335) describes the loss of ontological security among victims of the Chernobyl nuclear plant explosion, who had previously ascribed such faith in state authorities to ensure safety that an explosion was considered 'incomprehensible'.…”
Section: Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herman notes how our sense of safety and trust is acquired early in life and forms the basis of our systems of relationship and belief, but trauma can undermine these core belief systems and 'cast the victim into a state of existential crisis' (Herman 1992, 51). The state itself, and our ascription of legitimacy in it, is especially important to the maintenance of ontological security (Krolikowski 2008). Zhukova (2016, 335) describes the loss of ontological security among victims of the Chernobyl nuclear plant explosion, who had previously ascribed such faith in state authorities to ensure safety that an explosion was considered 'incomprehensible'.…”
Section: Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, ontological security has either been conceptualised in line with Giddens' intersubjective notion of self where states, like individuals, are concerned with maintaining a consistent notion of self to enhance their ontological security in relations with other states -the exogenous approach (Mitzen 2006a, 2006b, Zarakol 2010, or the emphasis has been on the state as a provider of ontological security for its citizens -the intra-subjective or endogenous approach (Steele 2005, Krolikowski 2008, in which state representatives are able to tell convincing stories about the self through autobiographical narratives (see also Subotic 2016). Here, the main inclination has been to problematise realist and liberal notions of security concerned with security dilemmas and physical security by focusing on "security-of-being" rather than "security-as-survival".…”
Section: Psycho- Socio- Politico-ontological Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ever since Alexander Wendt made a distinction between physical security, or 'differentiation from other actors', and ontological security, which has to do with the freedom from anxiety resulting from a predictable relationship with the world (Wendt 1994, 385), the literature on ontological security in world politics has grown exponentially (Huysmans 1998;McSweeney 1999;Mitzen 2006;Steele 2007;Kinnvall 2004Kinnvall , 2006Krolikowski 2008;Delehanty and Steele 2009;Zarakol 2010;Lupovici 2012;Youde 2014;Subotić 2016;Rumelili 2014Rumelili , 2015.…”
Section: Ontological Security: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%