1996
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199612263352610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Regulation of Managed Care and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28 Congress enacted ERISA in 1974 to safeguard employees' pension and other employment benefit plans and to ease the compliance efforts of national corporations by creating a single federal law. ERISA preempted a broad group of state laws pertaining to employee-benefit plans.…”
Section: Changes In the Law Concerning Liability Of Managed-care Orgamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Congress enacted ERISA in 1974 to safeguard employees' pension and other employment benefit plans and to ease the compliance efforts of national corporations by creating a single federal law. ERISA preempted a broad group of state laws pertaining to employee-benefit plans.…”
Section: Changes In the Law Concerning Liability Of Managed-care Orgamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reach of state regulatory structures is far less than it used to be, at the same time that the challenges of regulation are expanding. Under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1972 (ERISA), the federal government has oversight authority over many employee benefit plans; when such purchasers offer self-funded plans, they are not considered to be "insurance" and are not subject to regulation by states (Mariner 1996). Estimates by the US General Accounting Office (1995a) indicate that 114 million individuals were covered by ERISA-regulated plans in 1993, of whom 40 percent-40 million individuals-were in self-insured (i.e., self-funded) plans.…”
Section: The Growth Of Self-funded Plans Under Erisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such funding should avoid preemption under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, because it does not tax group health insurance benefits or premiums. 21 Relying solely on the ability of patients to leave one health plan and move to another is not sufficient to ensure either the rights of patients in managed-care plans or improvement in the quality of care. Improving opportunities for enrollees to voice their objections can both enhance patients' rights and highlight areas of potential concern with respect to quality.…”
Section: Dispute-resolution Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%