State responses to ‘Ethnic Riots’ in liberal democracies: evidence from Western Europe

Abstract

The study of ethnic riots has a substantial pedigree in the social sciences, but so far there has been no systematic attempt to unify insights from scholars working on different areas of the world, nor has there been any extensive application of existing knowledge to the study of Western Europe. We address these two lacunae by drawing on contemporary scholarship to generate testable hypotheses about state responses to ethnic riots in liberal democracies, and by conducting a preliminary test of these hypotheses on four controlled comparison cases from Britain and France. Our cases reveal that states employ a relatively even balance of repression and accommodation in keeping with thesocial controlperspective, but that the precise balance is affected by theelectoral incentivesof the party in power. This evidence suggests the external validity of findings by Fording (2001) – who emphasizes the significance of social control in the American context – and Wilkinson (2004) – who stresses the importance of electoral incentives in the Indian environment – but it implies that these separate insights may be more powerful in combination. Our study also demonstrates the limitations of perspectives that predict either simple repression or accommodation of rioters, and of those that emphasize distinctive national responses to riots.

Why Are Immigrants Underrepresented in Politics? Evidence from Sweden

“…Finally, and most dramatically, it has been argued that the political exclusion of immigrant-origin minorities has contributed to riots, as politically marginalized immigrant groups in France, Belgium, Great Britain, and elsewhere have taken their grievances to the streets (Bleich et al 2010; Dancygier 2010). A recent example of such disturbances occurred in Sweden, where the foreign-born constitute 15 percent of the population.…”

Political Mobilization and Government Targeting: When Do Dissidents Challenge the State?

“…In looking at violent and non-violent protest, Chenoweth and Stephan (2011) focus on direct challenges to government authority and maximalist claims to unseat the regime and argue that nonviolent strategies are often more effective in winning concessions. Work on violent anti-state ethnic protest in Britain and France finds that states use a relatively even balance of repression and accommodation but that the state's response is also affected by the electoral incentives of the ruling party (Bleich, Caeiro, & Luehrman, 2010). Beyond the protest literature, work on armed conflict and civil war has also emphasized challenges to the state, focusing on the role of popular grievances or mobilization opportunities that facilitate insurgency (Buhaug, Cederman, & Rød, 2008;Fearon & Laitin, 2003;Hegre, Ellingsen, Gates, & Gleditsch, 2001;Kalyvas, 2006).…”

The Extant of Conflict among Marginalised Communities: A Study in Kandhamal District of Odisha

“…Several terms like collective violence, ethnic riots, violent conflict, genocide, inter- and intra-community rivalry cross and inter-cross with each other. There are various dimensions, several labels, overlapping bases and even paradoxical purposes (see Bleich, Caeiro, & Luehrman, 2010). In most cases, one cannot insist on clear-cut exclusive types but there is a need to take them as momentous through changing and shifting crystallisations in a continuum of sociocultural contexts and processes.…”