State Responsibilities and International Nuclear Politics

Considine, Laura; Souter, James

doi:10.4324/9780429266317-12

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…74 Contemporary calls for a return to notions of 'nuclear responsibility' , not least in the context of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, draw directly on this line of argument originally developed by Aron and others. 75 In Aron's view, not only had the invention of nuclear weapons forced humanity to consider the future of its own existence like never before, it had altered the social fabric of interstate relations. As he put it, 'What are called weapons of mass destruction have changed something in the course of relations between what are called sovereign states.…”

Section: Structure International Society and Aron's Conception Of Nuc...mentioning

confidence: 99%

‘No one around to shut the dead eyes of the human race’: Sartre, Aron, and the limits of existentialism in the Nuclear Age

Zala

2023

Rev. Int. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Nuclear Age is said to be defined by the notion of existential threat. The ability to destroy human societies in their entirety with a single class of weaponry raises profound questions about human existence. It even gives us a new form of species extinction – ‘thermonuclear omnicide’. Unsurprisingly, existentialism was a philosophy that found its feet in the shadow of the bomb. This article explores the possibilities and limits of an existentialist approach to nuclear dangers. It contrasts the views of two figures central to early existentialism: Jean-Paul Sartre and Raymond Aron. Sartre responded to the existential threat of nuclear war with moral outrage about the ‘unreality’ of the Cold War politics driving the arms race and an existentialist call to reject militaristic social norms. Aron, a key figure in early IR realism, famously rejected existentialism and turned instead to outlining norms for an international society that might better restrain nuclear-armed decision-makers. Bringing Sartre’s and Aron’s post-Second World War discussions into the new century, this article argues that the ongoing, and even growing, threats posed by nuclear weapons highlight the limits of Sartre’s approach as a guide to authentic existence in modern life. Instead, it supports Aron’s more conservative approach but also draws on Existentialism to extend it, strengthening the nuclear taboo for the sake of human survival as a persistent but urgent political project. At a moment in IR when scholars and other analysts are once again critiquing the fragile norms of global order and speculating about the dawn of a ‘Third Nuclear Age’, theoretical reflection on the politics of existential threats and the hard choices they entail remain indispensable aspects of IR’s theoretical toolkit. While Sartre and other existentialists argued convincingly that existence precedes essence, Aron reminds us that survival remains a precondition for both.

show abstract

Section: Structure International Society and Aron's Conception Of Nuc...mentioning

confidence: 99%

‘No one around to shut the dead eyes of the human race’: Sartre, Aron, and the limits of existentialism in the Nuclear Age

Zala

2023

Rev. Int. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

State Responsibilities and International Nuclear Politics

Cited by 1 publication

References 19 publications

‘No one around to shut the dead eyes of the human race’: Sartre, Aron, and the limits of existentialism in the Nuclear Age

‘No one around to shut the dead eyes of the human race’: Sartre, Aron, and the limits of existentialism in the Nuclear Age

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About