2020
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State function‐based flash specifications for open systems in the absence or presence of chemical reactions

Abstract: Diverse engineering fields require flash calculations like isothermal flash, isenthalpic flash, and isentropic flash. They can be cast as minimization of a thermodynamic state function and solved by Michelsen's Q‐function approach. Flash calculations for open systems, that is, systems where chemical potentials are specified instead of the mole numbers for some components, also belong to this scope. By analyzing the construction of Q‐functions through Legendre transforms, we extend this approach to the flash fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Michelsen's [1] general formulation for flash calculations, in that of Smejkal and Mikyška [55], as well as in unified treatments of using RAND-type methods [46][47][48], a common Jacobian matrix is assembled, capable of handling all specifications. This is also possible for phase stability testing, but it would be rather a mathematical exercise, with no practical use, since minimization of TPD functions in their hyperspaces is not recommended for most specifications, as discussed throughout this paper; as shown earlier, phase stability testing for any major specifications can be reduced to either PT or VTN stability testing.…”
Section: Short Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Michelsen's [1] general formulation for flash calculations, in that of Smejkal and Mikyška [55], as well as in unified treatments of using RAND-type methods [46][47][48], a common Jacobian matrix is assembled, capable of handling all specifications. This is also possible for phase stability testing, but it would be rather a mathematical exercise, with no practical use, since minimization of TPD functions in their hyperspaces is not recommended for most specifications, as discussed throughout this paper; as shown earlier, phase stability testing for any major specifications can be reduced to either PT or VTN stability testing.…”
Section: Short Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another topic related to VTN stability is phase envelope construction in the VT (or molar density-temperature) plane [26,27,30,35]. PHN (isobaric isenthalpic) phase equilibrium (consisting of the maximization of entropy at given pressure, enthalpy and moles) [1][2][3][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] has many practical applications, such as adiabatic expansions, throttling processes, compositional reservoir simulation of thermal recovery processes, etc. Phase stability testing at PHN conditions can be assessed using a classical PT stability testing, as correctly mentioned by Michelsen [36], Zhu and Okuno [39], Sun et al [40]; however, no detailed analysis of phase stability testing was given for these very important specifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations