2000
DOI: 10.1080/002071700421727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State space control system design based on non-minimal state-variable feedback: Further generalization and unification results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with minimal state space models that represent the same system in a less intuitive manner, requiring each state to be formed from various, often rather abstract, combinations of the input and output signals. In this manner, the non-minimal formulation provides more design freedom than the equivalent minimal case, as discussed by [2].…”
Section: Control Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This contrasts with minimal state space models that represent the same system in a less intuitive manner, requiring each state to be formed from various, often rather abstract, combinations of the input and output signals. In this manner, the non-minimal formulation provides more design freedom than the equivalent minimal case, as discussed by [2].…”
Section: Control Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider in the first instance, a PIP controller based on TF models obtained from open-loop experiments at the 100% load operating condition. By first converting the TF models given by Tables 1 and 2 into MFD form (1), it is a straightforward exercise to develop the equivalent 24th order linear NMSS representation (2). Solution of the LQ cost function (8), subsequently yields a fixed gain PIP control agorithm (6), suitable for implementation in the forward path form of Fig.…”
Section: Performance Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The control system used in the illustrative example considered later in section 4 is based on the discrete-time Proportional-Integral-Plus (PIP) control system design methodology (see e.g. Young et al [1987], Taylor et al [2000] and the prior references therein).…”
Section: The Generalized Box-jenkins Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PIP-LQ control system is implemented in the forward path form, with a diagonal cost function weighting matrix having weights of 100 on the integral-of-error state and unity on the other non-minimal state variables (past values of the input and output signals): see Taylor et al [2000]. In all cases, the PIP control system is designed on the basis of the discrete-time equivalent of the continuous-time model at the selected sampling interval.…”
Section: Illustrative Examples: Estimation Within a Pip-lq Closed Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%