2007
DOI: 10.1002/env.859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State‐space discrimination and clustering of atmospheric time series data based on Kullback information measures

Abstract: SUMMARYStatistical problems in atmospheric science are frequently characterized by large spatio-temporal data sets and pose difficult challenges in classification and pattern recognition. Here, we consider the problem of identifying geographically homogeneous regions based on similarities in the temporal dynamics of weather patterns. Two disparity measures are proposed and applied to cluster time series of observed monthly temperatures from locations across Colorado, U.S.A. The two disparity measures are based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, Map). In recent years, new clustering methods have addressed challenges posed by the seasonal structure and autocorrelation inherent in atmospheric time series data (Bengtsson and Cavanaugh 2008;Lund and Li 2009). However, because the cluster analyses here do not rely on time series data, instead using only a matrix of monthly averages (normals), we used more traditional climate clustering methods (Fovell and Fovell 1993;Unal and others 2003) and instead employed bootstrapping (described below) to assess the sensitivity of our results to data artifacts.…”
Section: Cluster Analyses Of 1971-2000 Monthly Normals Derived From Wmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2, Map). In recent years, new clustering methods have addressed challenges posed by the seasonal structure and autocorrelation inherent in atmospheric time series data (Bengtsson and Cavanaugh 2008;Lund and Li 2009). However, because the cluster analyses here do not rely on time series data, instead using only a matrix of monthly averages (normals), we used more traditional climate clustering methods (Fovell and Fovell 1993;Unal and others 2003) and instead employed bootstrapping (described below) to assess the sensitivity of our results to data artifacts.…”
Section: Cluster Analyses Of 1971-2000 Monthly Normals Derived From Wmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this framework, cluster analysis is used to classify fields obtained from observed data to identify "prototype" of spatial patterns. By considering a functional representation, Bengtsson and Cavanaugh [54] modeled the observed time series in a state space setup and classified the sites via hierarchical clustering methods relying on disparity measures based on Kullback information. Kim et al [55] employed k-means clustering for classifying sites based on the temporal fluctuation of PM2.5.…”
Section: Literature Of Time Series Clustering/classification In Envirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature provides some new classification methods based on Functional Data Analysis (FDA, Ramsey and Silverman (2005); Ferraty and Vieu (2006)). In the context of the analysis of atmospheric time series, Bengtsson and Cavanaugh (2008) model the observed time series in a state space setup and classify the sites via hierarchical methods relying on disparity measures based on Kullback information. Ignaccolo et al (2008) apply a partition around medoids method to site classification in the air quality network of Piemonte (Italy).…”
Section: Environmetricsmentioning
confidence: 99%