2006
DOI: 10.1163/157181106779848359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statelessness and Roma Communities in the Czech Republic: Competing Theories of State Compliance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the law, non-Czechs who had an objectionable criminal record and individuals without verification of a five-year period of residence were ineligible for Czech citizenship. The law was probably drafted in order to exclude Roma, the majority of whom were considered Slovak by many Czechs, thus placing them in a state of statelessness (Fawn, 2001;Linde, 2006;Dedić, 2007). Passed in response to international pressure, the 1999 and 2003 amendments to the Czech nationality legislation remedied most of these problems.…”
Section: Czech National Identity and Ethnic Exclusionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the law, non-Czechs who had an objectionable criminal record and individuals without verification of a five-year period of residence were ineligible for Czech citizenship. The law was probably drafted in order to exclude Roma, the majority of whom were considered Slovak by many Czechs, thus placing them in a state of statelessness (Fawn, 2001;Linde, 2006;Dedić, 2007). Passed in response to international pressure, the 1999 and 2003 amendments to the Czech nationality legislation remedied most of these problems.…”
Section: Czech National Identity and Ethnic Exclusionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passed in response to international pressure, the 1999 and 2003 amendments to the Czech nationality legislation remedied most of these problems. Interestingly, Linde (2006) argues that these changes and compliance with international norms occurred not only as a result of the economic self-interest of the Czech Republic, but also because of changes in national identity and a 'Havelian identification of the Czech Republic as a European state' (Linde, 2006, p. 365). Yet the Czech government has never provided any compensation for those previously affected by the law (Dedić, 2007).…”
Section: Czech National Identity and Ethnic Exclusionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40/1993 Coll.). This legislation established criteria for citizenship (see Šiklová and Miklušáková, 1998) that, for some Roma, were difficult to meet and many of them consequently became persons without any state citizenship because they ‘did not have documentation to prove citizenship, had criminal records that prevented successful applications, or could not understand or afford the administrative procedures and costs required by the new law.’ (Linde, 2006: 342). The Act was condemned as intentionally denying Roma Czech citizenship (Fawn, 2001: 1193; Guy, 2001b: 299) and Vaclav Klaus government’s adoption and support of it was strongly criticised by Czech and international NGOs and other institutions (e.g.…”
Section: The Development Of the Activists’ Frames And Collective Actimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been a vivid discussion on a quandary of Roma considering their access to Czech citizenship after the 1993 peaceful split of Czechoslovakia (Kochenov, 2007;Linde, 2006;Š klová & Miklušá-ková, 1998;Struhárová, 1999).…”
Section: Impeded Access To Citizenship For Roma: the Case Of Czechoslmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The context of the state dissolution namely gives rise to new questions also in connection with citizenship and Romani minorities. As it was revealed in the exploration of the impact of the Czechoslovak Velvet Divorce, many Romani individuals residing in the Czech Republic after 1993 experienced difficulties in obtaining citizenship at their place of residence (Kochenov, 2007;Linde, 2006;Š klová & Miklušáková, 1998;Struhárová, 1999). Nevertheless, the post-Yugoslav case has to be studied separately due to different contexts, that is, the position of Romani minorities as well as the violent process of state dissolution and multiple disintegrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%