2017
DOI: 10.1353/aq.2017.0065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stateness as Landgrab: A Political History of Maya Dispossession in Guatemala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cases discussed here, public victims were often “unidentified” or their bodies were described as “unclaimed”. This discursive coding once again conjures the settler colonial dynamics discussed earlier: by racially prefiguring particular spatialities as “unclaimed” “wastelands” (Castro and Picq 2017), the bodies in those spaces become disposable. The absence of friends or kin to “claim” victims’ bodies strengthens the “ sexoservidoras ” or “ mareras ” narrative offered by state agents and subsequently crystallised in media.…”
Section: Social Circle Failurementioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the cases discussed here, public victims were often “unidentified” or their bodies were described as “unclaimed”. This discursive coding once again conjures the settler colonial dynamics discussed earlier: by racially prefiguring particular spatialities as “unclaimed” “wastelands” (Castro and Picq 2017), the bodies in those spaces become disposable. The absence of friends or kin to “claim” victims’ bodies strengthens the “ sexoservidoras ” or “ mareras ” narrative offered by state agents and subsequently crystallised in media.…”
Section: Social Circle Failurementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Simpson’s (2016) latter insight is crucial to the analysis that follows: because of the (racialised) land that they are taken to represent, indigenous women’s bodies are pre‐figured as “already violated” and thus “violatable”. Indeed, understanding why public femicide victims emerge representationally as “the garbage of society” in Guatemala requires accounting for the ways in which indigenous women’s bodies are pre‐figured as embodying spaces framed as “wastelands” by colonial dynamics (Castro and Picq 2017), and thinking through the implications of these logics. As Sherene Razack (2000) has argued, space is necessarily racialised in settler societies: public streets and marginalised neighbourhoods are framed as “occupied by racial Others”, which produces enormous consequences for indigenous and poor (and thus racialised) women.…”
Section: Settler Spaces Disposable Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a meeting with the community assembly, residents of Sachaj explained that they relied on an agrarian heritage that is highly communal in nature-since there was no individual title; no one person was able to sell their land entitlements in the absence of broad consent. The Peace Accords changed that with a new mandate on land administration authority, and with an emphasis on individual land titles (see [46] for more on land titles and the history of dispossession in Guatemala). On the one hand, this indeed upset communal land holdings.…”
Section: Respect and Protect-land Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El tercero de los pliegues contrahegemónicos de cara a las continuidades históricas del despojo agrario y la exclusión social es el manejo colectivo del bosque en el occidental departamento de Totonicapán. Este, de hecho, es un caso abundantemente documentado (Veblen, 1978) que supone el ejercicio descentralizado e ininterrumpido del poder político más antiguo en el continente americano (Castro & Picq, 2017). En este caso, la constitución de una subjetividad en resistencia en términos agrarios pasó por negociaciones con la Corona de España durante los años de la Colonia y un tejido social pacientemente constituido desde unas oportunas lecturas de la coyuntura.…”
unclassified