“States of Rebellion”: Civil War, Rural Unrest, and the Agrarian Question in the American South and the Italian Mezzogiorno, 1861–1865

Abstract

To date, only a handful of scholars, most notably C.L.R. James and Eugene Genovese, have seen slave rebellions and peasant revolts as having anything in common. Fewer scholars still would be prepared to accept the assumption that slaves and peasants were agrarian working classes that shared significant characteristics. Yet, the issues of rural unrest and class formation continue to haunt the historiography of both slave and peasant societies long after James' and Genovese's studies, and have forced several historians to revise and broaden their definitions of class conflict as a means to describe the social transformations of several rural regions. In this essay, I focus on the American South as a case study of a slave society and on the Italian South, or Mezzogiorno, as a case study of a peasant society. Notwithstanding the fundamental differences between the social structures of these two regions, in both cases debates on the class character of rural workers began when leftist historians raised the possibility of applying Marxist categories to their particular historical conditions. In both cases, they were dealing with a ‘south’ characterized by a preeminently agricultural economy and a persistent social and political conservatism. In both cases, too, the debate has moved from broad theoretical positions to the explanation of specific instances of class conflict in a rural setting—the slaves' resistance to their masters and the peasants' resistance to their landlords, respectively—and then on to a criticism of the Marxist approach to the problem.

Youth, Generations, and Collective Action in Nineteenth-Century Ireland and Italy

“…Enrico Dal Lago has argued that brigandage represented "the collective rebellion of the agrarian laborers against their landlords," with the aim to "achieve the status of a landed peasantry." 100 Land occupations, arson attacks on landed estates, and slaughter of livestock were acts perpetrated by both brigands and Irish agrarian agitators. Both groups engaged in ritualized acts of violence that, in certain circumstances, were tolerated within their rural communities.…”

Not a “Sack of Potatoes”: Why Labor Historians Need to Take Agriculture Seriously

“…9 Although the four remaining papers Why Labor Historians Need to Take Agriculture Seriously 5 span two hundred years and four continents and vary enormously in intent, character, and content, each highlights strikingly similar themes. We asked five historians specializing in different parts of the world-India, Italy, South Africa, Ecuador, and the American Midwest-to write about the significance of class formation in the countryside with an eye to what labor historians ought to know about agriculture.…”