2005
DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.6.418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statewide Intervention to Reduce Television Viewing in WIC Clients and Staff

Abstract: It is feasible to deliver television-reduction messages in large public health programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primary care‐based studies. Two studies (42) delivered in the primary care setting were described in our previous review (12). Additional results for one of these studies (43,44) have recently been published and are described below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary care‐based studies. Two studies (42) delivered in the primary care setting were described in our previous review (12). Additional results for one of these studies (43,44) have recently been published and are described below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educating parents on the definition of screen time (includes all screen activities, even if educational), screen‐use recommendations, and the negative health risks of excessive screen use are important first steps to decreasing preschoolers' SA. While relation to BMI was not assessed, adherence to AAP screen recommendations increased from 64.2% to 70.5% for families receiving women, infants, and children services who received similar educational messages (99). Education should be supplemented with strategies for modifying the home environment to facilitate compliance with screen limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As media was the primary source of children's health knowledge, public service announcements directed at young children might prove effective. This idea has some empirical support (Johnson et al . 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%