2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

stathmin, a Gene Enriched in the Amygdala, Controls Both Learned and Innate Fear

Abstract: Little is known about the molecular mechanisms of learned and innate fear. We have identified stathmin, an inhibitor of microtubule formation, as highly expressed in the lateral nucleus (LA) of the amygdala as well as in the thalamic and cortical structures that send information to the LA about the conditioned (learned fear) and unconditioned stimuli (innate fear). Whole-cell recordings from amygdala slices that are isolated from stathmin knockout mice show deficits in spike-timing-dependent long-term potentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
200
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
9
200
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Strong emotional memories could be established through fear conditioning, a form of associative learning, which results from assigning of predictive properties to an initially neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) after its pairing with an aversive unconditioned stimulus during behavioral training (3)(4)(5). Previous studies provide evidence for the correlative link between long-term potentiation in the CS pathways conveying auditory information to the lateral amygdala (LA) and fear learning (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). A recent work has confirmed and extended these earlier findings by showing that synaptic enhancements at the cortico-amygdala synapses could be observed in slices from conditioned animals for at least 10 days after fear conditioning (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong emotional memories could be established through fear conditioning, a form of associative learning, which results from assigning of predictive properties to an initially neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) after its pairing with an aversive unconditioned stimulus during behavioral training (3)(4)(5). Previous studies provide evidence for the correlative link between long-term potentiation in the CS pathways conveying auditory information to the lateral amygdala (LA) and fear learning (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). A recent work has confirmed and extended these earlier findings by showing that synaptic enhancements at the cortico-amygdala synapses could be observed in slices from conditioned animals for at least 10 days after fear conditioning (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L ong-term potentiation (LTP) in afferent inputs to the amygdala is recruited during fear conditioning and used for retention of fear memory (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). A subset of glutamatergic neurons in fear conditioning pathways, including pyramidal neurons in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA) where conditioned stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimuli converge during fear learning (6)(7)(8)(9), is enriched in zinc (Zn 2ϩ ) (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, there was no effect of genotype on activity level, sampled immediately preceding the onset of the startle stimulus ( Figure 2B). Since TRPC5's expression pattern was consistent with its role in fear-related behaviors, we assayed conditioned freezing (learned fear) using a classical single-trial fear conditioning paradigm with a relatively strong US (2s, 0.7mA foot shock; Shumyatsky et al, 2002Shumyatsky et al, , 2005. As shown in Figure 2D, we did not observe significant differences between control and mutant mice in conditioned freezing at 24h post-training.…”
Section: Innate Fear Responses and Conditioned Fear In Trpc5 −/− Micementioning
confidence: 92%
“…TRPC5 is also present in the hippocampus and dentate gyrus that project to the amygdala, and in the perirhinal cortex (PRh) that relays CS and somatosensory US information (Lanuza et al, 2004;LeDoux, 2000;Shi and Davis, 1999;Shumyatsky et al, 2005). Our findings show that responses to the CCK 2 receptor agonist, and cortico-amygdala EPSPs, mediated by Group I mGluRs, were significantly diminished in slices from TRPC5 −/− mice, while basal synaptic transmission in cortical and thalamic inputs to the LA and inputs from the LA to intercalated cells (Pare et al, 2004) was unaltered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation