2016
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and Dynamic Adaptation of Insect Photoreceptor Responses to Naturalistic Stimuli

Abstract: We describe a new nonlinear dynamic model of insect phototransduction using a NLN (nonlinear, linear, nonlinear) block structure. The first nonlinear stage provides a single exponential decline in gain and mean following the start of light stimulation. The linear stage uses a two-parameter log-normal convolution model previously applied alone to insect photoreceptors. The final stage is a static quadratic function. The model fitted current and voltage responses of isolated single photoreceptors from three diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests the interactive driving control function (push-pull) of the visual sensitivity specificity of DRA vision and non-DRA vision induced by the linear polarization effect of a heterogeneous spectrum. These results are consistent with the specific regulatory output results of different polarized spectrum light characteristics on the inhibition, arousal, and excitation synergism of the polarized optic nerve response in locusts [26][27][28][29] . When illumination increased, linearly polarized UV and violet light intensity enhanced the sensitivity of DRA vision in the polarotactic response effect, whereas linearly polarized blue, green, and orange light intensity enhanced the sensitivity of DRA vision in the visual trend and polarotactic aggregation response, but inhibited the sensitivity of non-DRA vision in the polarotactic response effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This suggests the interactive driving control function (push-pull) of the visual sensitivity specificity of DRA vision and non-DRA vision induced by the linear polarization effect of a heterogeneous spectrum. These results are consistent with the specific regulatory output results of different polarized spectrum light characteristics on the inhibition, arousal, and excitation synergism of the polarized optic nerve response in locusts [26][27][28][29] . When illumination increased, linearly polarized UV and violet light intensity enhanced the sensitivity of DRA vision in the polarotactic response effect, whereas linearly polarized blue, green, and orange light intensity enhanced the sensitivity of DRA vision in the visual trend and polarotactic aggregation response, but inhibited the sensitivity of non-DRA vision in the polarotactic response effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…7, A and B). Because light adaptation during responses to nonsaturating stimuli mainly affects initial voltage gain (French et al 2016) and not IR, and similarly modulates responses to both stimuli in the pair, we did not further control for light adaptation.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major feature of discharges of tibial campaniform sensilla to “naturalistic” torque stimuli was their sensitivity to fluctuations in forces ( 53 , 54 ). In many tests of flexor torques, firing of large 6B receptors occurred as a series of bursts, whereas discharges of smaller 6B receptors showed strong modulation of firing frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%