2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic loading behavior of a hybrid foundation for offshore wind turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To eliminate the boundary effects, a considerable zone of soil is generated with a height of 30 m, length of 60 m and width of 30 m [27,28]. Different from previous studies [29,30], this paper not only focuses on the deflection of monopile under the maximum wave and current load, but also analyzes the displacement variation during a wave-current action cycle. Under the above environmental conditions, the time domain response of the monopile foundation under wave load is calculated and shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Response Of Monopile Foundation Under Extreme Marine Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate the boundary effects, a considerable zone of soil is generated with a height of 30 m, length of 60 m and width of 30 m [27,28]. Different from previous studies [29,30], this paper not only focuses on the deflection of monopile under the maximum wave and current load, but also analyzes the displacement variation during a wave-current action cycle. Under the above environmental conditions, the time domain response of the monopile foundation under wave load is calculated and shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Response Of Monopile Foundation Under Extreme Marine Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinearity of the waves and the depth of the water are two keywords in the hydrodynamic analysis for fixed and floating wind turbines since offshore wind farms are generally implanted in areas of relatively shallow water, where the waves become more non-linear and lead to a considerable increase in hydrodynamic loads [30]. Cheng et al [31] analysed a numerical model with second-order wave effects for aero-hydrodynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines. Marino et al [32] evaluated the structural response of an offshore wind turbine subjected to two wave models: linear and non-linear, and observed that when the turbine is parked, the linear wave modelling approach significantly underestimates fatigue loads.…”
Section: Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the soil with poor drainage capacity, the reduction of soil shear modulus caused by residual pore water pressure should be considered [23]. Chen et al [24] proposed a hybrid foundation which composed the monopile and wide-shallow bucket, and concluded that the cylindrical platform of this foundation can effectively share the horizontal loading and bending moment of monopile foundation, which is better than the monopile foundation in anti-overturning capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%