2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9013-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and Dynamic Patient Characteristics as Predictors of Criminal Recidivism: A Prospective Study in a Dutch Forensic Psychiatric Sample.

Abstract: If clinicians in forensic psychiatry want to reduce risk of reoffending in their patientsAccurate assessments of patients' reoffending risk is of supreme importance in forensic psychiatric settings. Arguably, the extent to which risk is reduced during treatment and can be properly managed afterwards, are the prime markers for treatment success in such settings; accurate estimates of these parameters are therefore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This possibility is made less likely, however, by absence of any significant relationships among patients who were at risk when the assessments were conducted, and by the findings of significant inverse relationships between active psychotic symptoms and subsequent community violence over very short time spans (Monahan et al, 2001). Similar inverse relationships between symptoms favored as risk factors by forensic clinicians and violent outcomes have also been reported by others (Philipse, Koeter, Staak, & Brink, 2006). In addition, the finding that, just among the patients in secure facilities with psychosis, the severity of active symptoms was significantly inversely related to violence after discharge means that such symptoms alone cannot be defended 3 on ethical, professional, or empirical grounds as a reason to detain patients in maximum Had there been no significant association between psychotic symptom severity and subsequent violence, one might be tempted to defend such symptoms as valid violence risk factors by hypothesizing that patients with the most severe symptoms were not discharged until the symptoms were successfully treated.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This possibility is made less likely, however, by absence of any significant relationships among patients who were at risk when the assessments were conducted, and by the findings of significant inverse relationships between active psychotic symptoms and subsequent community violence over very short time spans (Monahan et al, 2001). Similar inverse relationships between symptoms favored as risk factors by forensic clinicians and violent outcomes have also been reported by others (Philipse, Koeter, Staak, & Brink, 2006). In addition, the finding that, just among the patients in secure facilities with psychosis, the severity of active symptoms was significantly inversely related to violence after discharge means that such symptoms alone cannot be defended 3 on ethical, professional, or empirical grounds as a reason to detain patients in maximum Had there been no significant association between psychotic symptom severity and subsequent violence, one might be tempted to defend such symptoms as valid violence risk factors by hypothesizing that patients with the most severe symptoms were not discharged until the symptoms were successfully treated.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, retrospective assessment of dynamic factors by researchers (as conducted by Gray et al, 2008, and many others), which is based on-probably limited-file information about the patient's functioning at that particular time, may be qualitatively different from the real time assessment by the treating clinician, advocated here. It may be different with respect to the information available to the assessor, the likelihood of bias due to the direct interaction between assessor and assessee (Philipse, Koeter, Van der Staak, & Van den Brink, 2006), and the opportunity to influence the predicted outcome by taking risk management measures (Douglas & Kropp, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black, 1982;Tennent and Way, 1984;Dell et al, 1987;Eronen et al, 1996;Buchanan, 1998;Friendship et al, 1999;Gagliardi et al, 2004;Jamieson and Taylor, 2004). Philipse et al (2006) applied dynamic factors in addition to static factors, but could not fi nd any effects of dynamic factors on recidivism. These authors, among others (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%