2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic periosteal elevation: a pilot study in a pig model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatively short consolidation periods chosen in the present study are based on previous experiments 17,25 . Although the absence of statistical significance among different consolidation periods was demonstrated previously by intact calvarial bone, 15,16 the cortical bone perforation might possibly enhance the differences with time 32 . The only exception in the present study is observed in the group without membrane in region R2a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relatively short consolidation periods chosen in the present study are based on previous experiments 17,25 . Although the absence of statistical significance among different consolidation periods was demonstrated previously by intact calvarial bone, 15,16 the cortical bone perforation might possibly enhance the differences with time 32 . The only exception in the present study is observed in the group without membrane in region R2a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In contrast to the conventional DO, the distraction cavity is bordered by the original surface of the bone base and the periosteal (i.e., cambial) layer when a gradual distraction of the periosteum is applied. By application of perforated distraction plates or meshes in different models of periosteal distraction osteogenesis (PDO), new bone was formed to varying extents 9‐17 . Sencimen et al 18 found significant differences in the extent of newly formed bone between conventional DO and PDO disclosed by high content of interstitial fatty tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exfoliated and returned periosteum promotes the process of new bone formation 30 by the mutual interaction of the bone matrix and osteoprogenitor cells in the periosteum. 1,24,25 Several factors may be attributed to the lack of significant differences between the groups for region R3. In the present study, the true viability of the periosteum was not evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, less invasive methods to create a surplus of soft tissues, and therefore reduce the risk for mucosal dehiscences, have been investigated: periosteal distraction (Schmidt et al 2002;Kessler et al 2007;Sencimen et al 2007;Oda et al 2009;Tudor et al 2010) and tissue engineered periosteum (Sch€ onmeyr et al 2009;Warnke et al 2009). In spite of the promising results, these methods are still experimental and have been tested only in animal experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%