2003
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:20030699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic response of ceramics and zirconium alumina concrete materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally corresponds to the experimental data [4]. However, quantitative comparison of the values of concrete strength has shown a significant difference between the results of the numerical simulation and the experimental data [4][5][6]. Figure 3 shows numerically obtained dependences of the compressive and tensile strength on strain rate for uniaxial compression and tension tests of zirconium alumina concrete samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is generally corresponds to the experimental data [4]. However, quantitative comparison of the values of concrete strength has shown a significant difference between the results of the numerical simulation and the experimental data [4][5][6]. Figure 3 shows numerically obtained dependences of the compressive and tensile strength on strain rate for uniaxial compression and tension tests of zirconium alumina concrete samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The high-performance fiber reinforced concrete, CARDIFRC, developed and produced at Cardiff University (Benson & Karihaloo, 2005a,b;Benson, Nicolaides, & Karihaloo, 2005) was tested using the Hopkinson Split Bar (HSB) equipment (with steel bar diameter 20 mm) (Akopov et al, 2003). Standard Brazil tests were conducted on circular discs of CARDIFRC (diameter 15 mm and thickness 10 mm).…”
Section: Dynamic Fracture Of Cardifrcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However according to the criterion of incubatory time, dynamic strength is characterized by the incubatory time, but not the maximum stress. For simplicity of understanding, we consider simple test methods, such as the split Hopkinson bar test (the Kolsky method) [10][11][12] and the spall test [13]. Such tests allow to carry out calculations in one-dimensional statement.…”
Section: Calculation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%