2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.06.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static arrangement of a capillary porous system (CPS): Modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our numerical results were also tested against the Washburn equation as will be discussed in subsection 6.3. As far as the electrostatic model is concerned, comparison of the present numerical approach for the static arrangement of a polymeric droplet that rests on a solid surface with a fixed contact angle θ c = 60 o , Bond el = 5.06 and Bond = 0.33, against the boundary element solution obtained by Reznik et al, [92], indicates that our results agree with the maximum and minimum values of z and r, respectively, for the case of negligible electric stress [108], Fig 5 .19. However, partial agreement is observed, when the case with an external electric field is studied.…”
Section: Benchmark Case Studiessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Our numerical results were also tested against the Washburn equation as will be discussed in subsection 6.3. As far as the electrostatic model is concerned, comparison of the present numerical approach for the static arrangement of a polymeric droplet that rests on a solid surface with a fixed contact angle θ c = 60 o , Bond el = 5.06 and Bond = 0.33, against the boundary element solution obtained by Reznik et al, [92], indicates that our results agree with the maximum and minimum values of z and r, respectively, for the case of negligible electric stress [108], Fig 5 .19. However, partial agreement is observed, when the case with an external electric field is studied.…”
Section: Benchmark Case Studiessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The latter is envisioned as a means to protect the divertor wall of a fusion reactor from the high fluxes of heat and particles released by plasma activity in the bulk of the reactor. Clearly, the interaction between the CPS and the surrounding plasma is more complex in reality, but this simplified approach, which has also been previously used in [19,20] and possibly leads to an overestimation of the system's permeability [19], is necessary in order to obtain an in-depth understanding of the involved phenomena and the manner in which they affect the dynamic behavior of the liquid-metal interface. It is therefore important to perform a more extensive parametric analysis that examines the effect of other parameters as well, like the pore size, the intensity of the magnetic field, and the structure of the porous medium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with u l and u s,n denoting the normal velocity of the liquid at the interface and of the interface, respectively, n the unit normal vector at the interface pointing outwards with respect to the liquid metal, and r s = r int (ξ)e r + z int (ξ)e z is the Lagrangian representation of the interface. Furthermore, we adopted a fixed contact point approach [19,20] for the shape of the interface as it approaches the pore-substrate interface at the top, and the boundary conditions corresponding to the liquid metal velocity and the location of the interface at the pore wall are:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stability analysis of liquid metal PFCs in plasmas has been conducted by several authors [20,[24][25][26][27][28][29]. In the current study, the focus is on the static planar liquid surface exposed to a magnetized plasma under the influences of a sheath electric field (E Φ ) and an external magnetic field (B 0 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%