Static Behavior of Wood‐Joist Floors at Various Limit States

Wheat, Dan L.; Gromala, David S.; Moody, R. C.

doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1986)112:7(1677)

Cited by 23 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The static wall test results yielded average ductility ratios of 2.0 and 1.7 for the OSB and plywood walls, respectively (Lacroix 2013). These observations are consistent with the findings from other published studies (Gromala 1983;Foschi 1985;Wheat et al 1986;Liu and Bulleit 1995b;Bulleit et al 2005). Figure 3 shows a representative load-displacement graph from the static testing conducted on the walls.…”

Section: Evaluation Of Ductility Ratios For Light-frame Wood Stud Wallssupporting

confidence: 91%

Damage level assessment of response limits in light-frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Evaluation Of Ductility Ratios For Light-frame Wood Stud Wallssupporting

confidence: 91%

Damage level assessment of response limits in light-frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…See their table 6. Wheat et al (1986) created 15 full-scale test floors (three replications of five distinct test floors). For each of these floors they reported both the ultimate load and the load at first member failure.…”

Section: Confusion About the Methods Of Calculating A Repetitive Member Adjustmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Repetitive member factors for the allowable properties of wood products

Verrill¹,

Kretschmann²

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This publication is also available online at www.fpl.fs.fed.us. Laboratory publications are sent to hundreds of libraries in the United States and elsewhere.The Forest Products Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin.The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) of any product or service.The USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.

show abstract

System behaviour of wood truss assemblies

Gupta

2005

Progress Structural Eng Maths

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wood truss assemblies are widely used in light frame construction all over the world. Although the volume of literature on single trusses and joints is relatively huge, the system behaviour of truss assemblies has received only limited attention. The main approach to take into account the system behaviour of an assembly is to use a system factor in the design of single trusses. However, technical advances now make it possible to analyse and design these complex assemblies as systems using three-dimensional structural analysis programs, thereby including the system effect directly. This paper presents an overview of previous research on system behaviour of truss assemblies and recommends a system design approach to designing truss assemblies.

show abstract

Static Behavior of Wood‐Joist Floors at Various Limit States

Cited by 23 publications

References 0 publications

Damage level assessment of response limits in light-frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading

Damage level assessment of response limits in light-frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading

Repetitive member factors for the allowable properties of wood products

System behaviour of wood truss assemblies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About