2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static behaviour of glass fibre reinforced novel composite sleepers for mainline railway track

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum load and displacement (Figure 5b) observed from calibrated equipment were 325 kN at 11.1 mm for specimen-1 and 405 kN at 13 mm for specimen-2, respectively, provided an average MOR of 94 MPa according to Equation (3) where M is the average ultimate moment and c is the distance of outer fibre from the neutral axis. The MOR obtained for this sleeper is significantly higher than the MOR of softwood timber (22-34 MPa) and hardwood timber sleepers (55 MPa) [4].…”
Section: Modulus Of Rupture (Mor)contrasting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum load and displacement (Figure 5b) observed from calibrated equipment were 325 kN at 11.1 mm for specimen-1 and 405 kN at 13 mm for specimen-2, respectively, provided an average MOR of 94 MPa according to Equation (3) where M is the average ultimate moment and c is the distance of outer fibre from the neutral axis. The MOR obtained for this sleeper is significantly higher than the MOR of softwood timber (22-34 MPa) and hardwood timber sleepers (55 MPa) [4].…”
Section: Modulus Of Rupture (Mor)contrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The increase of sectional modulus and moment capacity with the increase of tube thickness from 1 mm to 10 mm are summarised in Table 3. The moment capacity and modulus of elasticity (MOE) of the composite sleepers can be as low as 25 kN-m [4] and 4 GPa [14], respectively. Based on the compressive failure at the top side of GFRP, Table 3 suggested that a thin layer of GFRP tube (even 1 mm) can meet the requirements of moment capacity, however, a minimum thickness of 4 mm is required to meet the target MOE of 4 GPa.…”
Section: Development Of the Sleeper Concept And Performance Evaluation 21 Selection Of Suitable Polymermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The distance between the center lines of railways is 5 m, the distance between two rails of a railway is 1.4 m, the sleeper spacing is 0.6 m and the width at the bottom of the track-bed is 4 m. According to the geological condition of the land, the soil was simplified into three layers including an artificial fill layer with a thickness of 5 m, a cohesive soil layer with a thickness of 25 m, and a mucky soil layer with a thickness of 15 m. In addition, as shown in Figure 3, several viscoelastic solid units with a thickness of 1 m were set as an artificial boundary at the bottom of three layers of soil and around the soil in the model. The material parameters of rail, sleeper, track-bed, and three layers of soil are shown in Table 1 [19][20][21].…”
Section: An Finite Element Model and Its Verification Of Reasonabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%