1986
DOI: 10.1109/tcs.1986.1085856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static bifurcations in electric power networks: Loss of steady-state stability and voltage collapse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
77
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows us to introduce a set of new variables (relative angles) and reduce the number of differential equations in the first subsystem in (3) by one [3].…”
Section: Daes As Models Of Power Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows us to introduce a set of new variables (relative angles) and reduce the number of differential equations in the first subsystem in (3) by one [3].…”
Section: Daes As Models Of Power Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to better understand dynamical properties of power systems, their stability features and the impact of various parameters, the DAEs approach seems to be very important as was shown in a number of recent papers (see for example [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(b) and (c), any transition cannot be defined in the present formalism. This shows a loss of causality [25], [26] of the DAE (2) and possibly indicates a modeling breakdown. 1 Here, to use the above modeling, it is 1 It has been unclear whether the lose of model causality directly implies the system instability or not.…”
Section: B Modeling Of Transition Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the past most of the work that was conducted would have linked the voltage collapse to a static bifurcation done by Kwatny et al [2], Schlutere et al [3], and Thomas and Tiranunchit [4]. While, the dynamic bifurcation was linked by Abed and Varaiya [5], Abed et al [6], Rajagopalan et al [7], Dobson et al [8], and Nayfeh et al [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%