2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45789-5_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static Confidentiality Enforcement for Distributed Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few representative studies include [Sab01,ABC04]. Already in a distributed setting, but restricting interaction between domains to the exchange of values (no code mobility), Mantel and Sabelfeld [SM02] provided a type system for preserving confidentiality for different kinds of channels over a publicly observable medium.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few representative studies include [Sab01,ABC04]. Already in a distributed setting, but restricting interaction between domains to the exchange of values (no code mobility), Mantel and Sabelfeld [SM02] provided a type system for preserving confidentiality for different kinds of channels over a publicly observable medium.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20,19] the notion of noninterference for sequential and multithreaded programs is expressed in terms of a partial equivalence relation (per model) which captures the view of a σ-level observer. Intuitively, a configuration C, representing a program and the current state of the memory, is secure if C ∼ σ C where ∼ σ is a symmetric and transitive relation modeling the σ-level observation of program executions.…”
Section: Noninterference Through a Partial Equivalence Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secure contexts are also studied by Sabelfeld and Mantel in [34] where they propose a timing-sensitive security definition for programs in a simple multi-threaded language. Sabelfeld and Mantel give a syntactic characterization of a class of contexts in their language which preserve security, i.e., they are secure whenever one substitutes holes with secure programs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%