2015
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jera.18.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static Force Model-Based Stiffness Model for Pneumatic Muscle Actuators

Abstract: Pneumatic muscle actuators (PMAs) differ from general pneumatic systems as they have no inner moved parts and there is no sliding on the surfaces. During action they reach high velocities, while the power/weight and power/volume rations reach high levels. The main drawbacks of PMAs are limited contraction (relative displacement), nonlinear and time variable behaviour, existence of hysteresis and step-jump pressure (to start radial diaphragm deformation) and also antagonistic connection of PMAs to generate two-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Properties, shapes, and behaviour of pneumatic artificial muscles are comparable to human muscles; this makes them easy to combine into more complex manipulation mechanisms. Other important properties of pneumatic artificial muscles are listed in papers [19,20] and their basic drawbacks are described by Mižáková [21] and Wickramatunge et al [22] The basic principle of their action is presented by Trojanova andČakurda [23], Hošovský et al [24], Tóthová and Pitel' [25], and Sárosi et al [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties, shapes, and behaviour of pneumatic artificial muscles are comparable to human muscles; this makes them easy to combine into more complex manipulation mechanisms. Other important properties of pneumatic artificial muscles are listed in papers [19,20] and their basic drawbacks are described by Mižáková [21] and Wickramatunge et al [22] The basic principle of their action is presented by Trojanova andČakurda [23], Hošovský et al [24], Tóthová and Pitel' [25], and Sárosi et al [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%