Static Guided Nonsurgical Approach for Calcified Canals of Anterior Teeth

Buchgreitz, Jørgen; Bjørndal, Lars; Sobrinho, Antônio Paulino Ribeiro; Tavares, Warley Luciano Fonseca; Kinariwala, Niraj; Maia, Lucas Moreira

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55281-7_6

Guided Endodontics 2020

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-55281-7_6

|View full text |Cite

Static Guided Nonsurgical Approach for Calcified Canals of Anterior Teeth

Jørgen Buchgreitz¹,

Lars Bjørndal

Antônio Paulino Ribeiro Sobrinho

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Guided Endodontics: Static vs. Dynamic Computer-Aided Techniques—A Literature Review

Ribeiro

Reis

Marques

et al. 2022

JPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: access cavity preparation is the first stage of non-surgical endodontic treatment. The inaccuracy of this step may lead to numerous intraoperative complications, which impair the root canal treatment’s prognosis and therefore the tooth’s survival. Guided endodontics, meaning computer-aided static (SN) and dynamic navigation (DN) techniques, has recently emerged as a new approach for root canal location in complex cases. This review aims to compare SN and DN guided endodontics’ techniques in non-surgical endodontic treatment. (2) Methods: an electronic search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases until October 2021. Studies were restricted by language (English, Spanish and Portuguese) and year of publication (from 2011 to 2021). (3) Results: a total of 449, 168 and 32 articles were identified in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, respectively, after the initial search. Of the 649 articles, 134 duplicates were discarded. In this case, 67 articles were selected after title and abstract screening, of which 60 were assessed for eligibility through full-text analysis, with one article being excluded. Four cross-references were added. Thus, 63 studies were included. (4) Conclusions: guided endodontics procedures present minimally invasive and accurate techniques which allow for highly predictable root canal location, greater tooth structure preservation and lower risk of iatrogenic damage, mainly when performed by less experienced operators. Both SN and DN approaches exhibit different advantages and disadvantages that make them useful in distinct clinical scenarios.

show abstract

Guided Endodontics: Static vs. Dynamic Computer-Aided Techniques—A Literature Review

Ribeiro

Reis

Marques

et al. 2022

JPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Static Guided Nonsurgical Approach for Calcified Canals of Anterior Teeth

Cited by 1 publication

References 46 publications

Guided Endodontics: Static vs. Dynamic Computer-Aided Techniques—A Literature Review

Guided Endodontics: Static vs. Dynamic Computer-Aided Techniques—A Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About