2013 2nd International Symposium on Instrumentation and Measurement, Sensor Network and Automation (IMSNA) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/imsna.2013.6743432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static hand gesture recognition based on HOG characters and support vector machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pose and gesture classification is the last but somehow most determining step in recognition. It can be resolved by many popular artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms including K-nearest neighbors [90,91], hidden Markov model [92,93], support vector machines [94][95][96][97], artificial neural networks [98][99][100], and deep learning algorithms, from which currently two methods are popular, namely convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks [101].…”
Section: Pose and Gesture Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pose and gesture classification is the last but somehow most determining step in recognition. It can be resolved by many popular artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms including K-nearest neighbors [90,91], hidden Markov model [92,93], support vector machines [94][95][96][97], artificial neural networks [98][99][100], and deep learning algorithms, from which currently two methods are popular, namely convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks [101].…”
Section: Pose and Gesture Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 exposes the DM kNN architecture combined with FoV. The two image inputs are used as inputs through the popular histogram of oriented gradient (HOG) approach, the centroid value of each target is obtained [26].…”
Section: ) Target Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative analysis of newly proposed method with wavelet transform, Curvelet, Gabor filter, Legendre moments, Zernike, Gaussian Hermite moment, Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) [24]were carried out in both the data set. In case of GMA no preprocessing is applied for recognition of both datasets but in case of other methods Grantha images are binarized using sauvola method before applying the concerned algorithm.…”
Section: Evalution Of Gma On Hpl and Grantha Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%