2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static postural sway of women with and without fibromyalgia syndrome: A cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results derived from this study show that women with FMS have impaired postural control compared with their healthy counterparts. These results are consistent with previous studies [ 9 11 , 13 , 24 ] but also yield some new findings about the postural control strategy. In general, there is a significant increase in the values of the linear variables (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results derived from this study show that women with FMS have impaired postural control compared with their healthy counterparts. These results are consistent with previous studies [ 9 11 , 13 , 24 ] but also yield some new findings about the postural control strategy. In general, there is a significant increase in the values of the linear variables (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Specifically, the Ellipse values were an average of 2.03 times higher in women with FMS than in healthy women. This result means that the COP trajectory covers a larger area in this population while standing and it is consistent with the results of a previous study conducted in women with fibromyalgia that reported a similar increase in the area in a bipedal test with eyes open [ 11 ]. It also coincides with the results of previous studies conducted in people with Multiple Sclerosis [ 17 ] or vestibular system problems [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of these, 345 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria (reasons for their exclusion are showed in Figure 1 ). Finally, 19 studies [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ] were included in the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%