Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
We discuss the rainbow Ramsey theorems at limit cardinals and successors of singular cardinals, addressing some questions by Uri Abraham, James Cummings, and Clifford Smyth [J. Symbolic Logic 72 (2007), pp. 865–895] and Uri Abraham and James Cummings [Cent. Eur. J. Math. 10 (2012), pp. 1004–1016]. In particular, we show for inaccessible κ \kappa , κ → p o l y ( κ ) 2 − b d d 2 \kappa \to ^{poly}(\kappa )^2_{2-bdd} does not characterize weak compactness and for any singular cardinal κ \kappa , ◻ κ \square _\kappa implies κ + ↛ p o l y ( η ) > κ − b d d 2 \kappa ^+\not \to ^{poly} (\eta )^2_{>\kappa -bdd} for any η ≥ c f ( κ ) + \eta \geq cf(\kappa )^+ and κ > c f ( κ ) = κ \kappa ^{>cf(\kappa )}=\kappa implies κ + → p o l y ( ν ) > κ − b d d 2 \kappa ^+\to ^{poly} (\nu )^2_{>\kappa -bdd} for any ν > c f ( κ ) + \nu >cf(\kappa )^+ . We also provide a simplified construction of a model for ω 2 ↛ p o l y ( ω 1 ) 2 − b d d 2 \omega _2\not \to ^{poly} (\omega _1)^2_{2-bdd} originally constructed by Uri Abraham and James Cummings [Cent. Eur. J. Math. 10 (2012), pp. 1004–1016] and show the witnessing coloring is indestructible under strongly proper forcings but destructible under some c.c.c forcing. Finally, we conclude with some remarks and questions on possible generalizations to rainbow partition relations for triples.
We discuss the rainbow Ramsey theorems at limit cardinals and successors of singular cardinals, addressing some questions by Uri Abraham, James Cummings, and Clifford Smyth [J. Symbolic Logic 72 (2007), pp. 865–895] and Uri Abraham and James Cummings [Cent. Eur. J. Math. 10 (2012), pp. 1004–1016]. In particular, we show for inaccessible κ \kappa , κ → p o l y ( κ ) 2 − b d d 2 \kappa \to ^{poly}(\kappa )^2_{2-bdd} does not characterize weak compactness and for any singular cardinal κ \kappa , ◻ κ \square _\kappa implies κ + ↛ p o l y ( η ) > κ − b d d 2 \kappa ^+\not \to ^{poly} (\eta )^2_{>\kappa -bdd} for any η ≥ c f ( κ ) + \eta \geq cf(\kappa )^+ and κ > c f ( κ ) = κ \kappa ^{>cf(\kappa )}=\kappa implies κ + → p o l y ( ν ) > κ − b d d 2 \kappa ^+\to ^{poly} (\nu )^2_{>\kappa -bdd} for any ν > c f ( κ ) + \nu >cf(\kappa )^+ . We also provide a simplified construction of a model for ω 2 ↛ p o l y ( ω 1 ) 2 − b d d 2 \omega _2\not \to ^{poly} (\omega _1)^2_{2-bdd} originally constructed by Uri Abraham and James Cummings [Cent. Eur. J. Math. 10 (2012), pp. 1004–1016] and show the witnessing coloring is indestructible under strongly proper forcings but destructible under some c.c.c forcing. Finally, we conclude with some remarks and questions on possible generalizations to rainbow partition relations for triples.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.