General Relativity, Cosmology and Astrophysics 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06349-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary Black-Hole Binaries: A Non-existence Proof

Abstract: We resume former discussions of the question, whether the spin-spin repulsion and the gravitational attraction of two aligned black holes can balance each other. Based on the solution of a boundary problem for disconnected (Killing) horizons and the resulting violation of characteristic black hole properties, we present a non-existence proof for the equilibrium configuration in question. From a mathematical point of view, this result is a further example for the efficiency of the inverse ("scattering") method … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A very interesting application of the area-angular momentum inequality (174), with Q = 0, is the result by Neugebauer and Hennig (2009); Hennig and Neugebauer (2011); Neugebauer and Hennig (2012), and Neugebauer and Hennig (2014) where they prove that there does not exist a two black hole configuration in equilibrium. This problem has been open since the early days of General Relativity (see Neugebauer and Hennig 2014 for further references and Beig and Chruściel 1996;Beig and Schoen 2009;Manko et al 2011 for different approaches and results on the subject). The Neugebauer and Hennig argument is the following: Start out with the spacetime metric for an axially symmetric, stationary system containing two disconnected Killing horizons on the symmetry axis.…”
Section: An Application: Non-existence Of Two Black Holes In Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very interesting application of the area-angular momentum inequality (174), with Q = 0, is the result by Neugebauer and Hennig (2009); Hennig and Neugebauer (2011); Neugebauer and Hennig (2012), and Neugebauer and Hennig (2014) where they prove that there does not exist a two black hole configuration in equilibrium. This problem has been open since the early days of General Relativity (see Neugebauer and Hennig 2014 for further references and Beig and Chruściel 1996;Beig and Schoen 2009;Manko et al 2011 for different approaches and results on the subject). The Neugebauer and Hennig argument is the following: Start out with the spacetime metric for an axially symmetric, stationary system containing two disconnected Killing horizons on the symmetry axis.…”
Section: An Application: Non-existence Of Two Black Holes In Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in theorem 3.2 has been used in a recent non-existence proof of stationary black holes binaries [67] [66] [22].…”
Section: Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%