2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary damage modelling of poroelastic contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(89 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thin gel results for microindentation (Table 1) seem to be particularly afflicted with this, since comparison of the viscoelastic analysis-which assumes bulk half-space behavior-and the poroelastic analysis for a subset of the same gels (Table 2) hours. Recently, a suggestion has been made [21], based on previous analyses of the poroelastic spherical indentation problem [31,32] that a "master curve" approach could 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 The original suggestion and earlier analyses [21,31,32] were all based on step-load creep experiments, but there is no physical reason that a similar approach could not be adopted for displacement-controlled relaxation tests under more typical experimental conditions. The rapid identification of permeability from indentation tests would allow for "permeability mapping" of biological tissues or inhomogeneous materials, similar in concept to the "modulus map" approach already being used for elastic characterization of inhomogeneous materials and tissues [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thin gel results for microindentation (Table 1) seem to be particularly afflicted with this, since comparison of the viscoelastic analysis-which assumes bulk half-space behavior-and the poroelastic analysis for a subset of the same gels (Table 2) hours. Recently, a suggestion has been made [21], based on previous analyses of the poroelastic spherical indentation problem [31,32] that a "master curve" approach could 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 The original suggestion and earlier analyses [21,31,32] were all based on step-load creep experiments, but there is no physical reason that a similar approach could not be adopted for displacement-controlled relaxation tests under more typical experimental conditions. The rapid identification of permeability from indentation tests would allow for "permeability mapping" of biological tissues or inhomogeneous materials, similar in concept to the "modulus map" approach already being used for elastic characterization of inhomogeneous materials and tissues [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies of permeability alteration due to stress states are given by Zoback and Byerlee (1975), David and Darot (1989), David et al (1994), Shiping et al (1994), Kiyama et al (1996), and Selvadurai and Głowacki (2008). Applications of damage mechanics-based interpretations of permeability evolution are given by Mahyari and Selvadurai (1998), Selvadurai and Shirazi (2004) and an extensive review of the influence of damage on poroelastic behaviour is given by Selvadurai (2004b). The basic philosophy in transient testing is that a fluid volume in contact with the saturated porous medium can be pressurized and the pressure will decay as the fluid migrates from the cavity to the porous domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sequence has the lowest hydraulic conductivity, and along with other attributes is considered to be a suitable formation for siting a DGR. The composition of the Lindsay Limestone is quite distinct from other limestones that are highly porous due to their vuggy nature that can result from cracks, fissures and stress-induced damage zones (Selvadurai 2004). This paper deals with the experimental determination of the permeability characteristics of the Lindsay Limestone using results of axial flow hydraulic pulse tests conducted on cylindrical samples with a diameter 100 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%