2020
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary distributions of systems with discreteness-induced transitions

Abstract: We provide a theoretical analysis of some autocatalytic reaction networks exhibiting the phenomenon of discreteness-induced transitions. The family of networks that we address includes the celebrated Togashi and Kaneko model. We prove positive recurrence, finiteness of all moments and geometric ergodicity of the models in the family. For some parameter values, we find the analytic expression for the stationary distribution and discuss the effect of volume scaling on the stationary behaviour of the chain. We fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that these bimodalities cannot be captured by the corresponding deterministic model, which predicted monostability (the result is not shown). Such mismatches between the stochastic and deterministic model have been frequently observed in the presence of timescale separation ( 1, 20, 48 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Note that these bimodalities cannot be captured by the corresponding deterministic model, which predicted monostability (the result is not shown). Such mismatches between the stochastic and deterministic model have been frequently observed in the presence of timescale separation ( 1, 20, 48 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Note that these bimodalities cannot be captured by the corresponding deterministic model, which predicted monostability. Such mismatches between the stochastic and deterministic model have been frequently observed in the presence of timescale separation 1 , 20 , 47 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(Hoessly and Mazza 2019, § 3)) and with Z Γ the normalising constant. Some other results on the stochastic behavior of CRN beyond complex balance are in (Bibbona et al 2020) or (Levien and Bressloff 2017).…”
Section: Known Results On Stationary Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Anderson et al 2010;Hoessly and Mazza 2019)). Nonetheless, some examples with stationary distribution of non-product form are available (Levien and Bressloff 2017, § 4.1) or (Bibbona et al 2020), but calculating it or even writing it down in small examples is demanding. -By definition, p 12 (Γ ) = p 21 (Γ ), and condition (B3) requires the functions f 1 i , f 2 i with S i ∈ S 1 ∩ S 2 to be proportional on p S i (Γ ) ⊆ Z ≥0 .…”
Section: Remark 9 [Assumptions I]mentioning
confidence: 99%