2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1808.05010
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary entrance Markov chains, inducing, and level-crossings of random walks

Aleksandar Mijatović,
Vladislav Vysotsky

Abstract: For an arbitrary (possibly transient) Markov chain Y with values in a Polish space, consider the entrance Markov chain obtained by sampling Y at the moments when it enters a fixed set A from its complement A c . Similarly, consider the exit Markov chain, obtained by sampling Y at the exit times from A c into A. This paper provides a framework for analysing invariant measures of these two types of Markov chains in the case when the initial chain Y has a known σ-finite invariant measure. Under certain mild assum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this proof gives no insight into the form of π + , in Section 2.3 we present a heuristic argument which we used to find this invariant distribution. The invariance of π + is also established in our companion paper [15,Corollary to Theorem 3] in a much more general setting using entirely different methods based on infinite ergodic theory; the proof presented here precedes the one in [15]. By [15, Corollary to Theorem 4], the assumption in (1) implies that the law π + is a unique (up to multiplicative constant) locally finite Borel invariant measure of the chain of overshoots O on Z.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since this proof gives no insight into the form of π + , in Section 2.3 we present a heuristic argument which we used to find this invariant distribution. The invariance of π + is also established in our companion paper [15,Corollary to Theorem 3] in a much more general setting using entirely different methods based on infinite ergodic theory; the proof presented here precedes the one in [15]. By [15, Corollary to Theorem 4], the assumption in (1) implies that the law π + is a unique (up to multiplicative constant) locally finite Borel invariant measure of the chain of overshoots O on Z.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“….+S k ) 1≤k≤n stays positive (see Vysotsky [23,24]). A detailed discussion with applications and further connections to a special class of Markov chains called random walks with switch at zero, is available in [15,Section 1.2]. Let us mention that distributions of the same form as π + appear on many occasions -this is discussed in Sections 2.1 and 2.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also establish the convergence of Law(O n ) to µ * in an appropriate sense, depending on the exact assumptions. Generalizations to entrance Markov chains on more general state spaces have been obtained in [12].…”
Section: Stability Of Overshootsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where by Assumption 2.1, (12) holds true, and thus for any fixed u ∈ [0, 1], the random map x → Φ(x, u, η n+1 ) is constant on with probability α showing that X ′ n forgets its previous state with positive probability. This observation will play later a central role later.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation