2021
DOI: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary solutions of a free boundary problem modeling the growth of vascular tumors with a necrotic core

Abstract: In this paper, we present a rigorous mathematical analysis of a free boundary problem modeling the growth of a vascular solid tumor with a necrotic core. If the vascular system supplies the nutrient concentration σ to the tumor at a rate β, then ∂σ ∂n + β(σ −σ) = 0 holds on the tumor boundary, where n is the unit outward normal to the boundary andσ is the nutrient concentration outside the tumor. The living cells in the nonnecrotic region proliferate at a rate µ. We show that for any given ρ > 0, there exists … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to prove μ=μ1 is a bifurcation point, it is required to verify the four conditions of the Crandall‐Rabinowitz theorem at this point. First of all, the differentiability of the map follows the same argument as in the papers, 10,23,25,29,30 and the condition (1) in the Crandall‐Rabinowitz theorem is naturally satisfied. For the remaining conditions, we need to prove []trueR˜false(0,μ1false)cosmθ0,5ptfor5pt0.1emm1. As is mentioned, it has been established in Zhao and Hu 10 that there exists a bound E 2 > 0, when 0 < ϵ < E 2 , we have () to be true for each m ≥ 2.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to prove μ=μ1 is a bifurcation point, it is required to verify the four conditions of the Crandall‐Rabinowitz theorem at this point. First of all, the differentiability of the map follows the same argument as in the papers, 10,23,25,29,30 and the condition (1) in the Crandall‐Rabinowitz theorem is naturally satisfied. For the remaining conditions, we need to prove []trueR˜false(0,μ1false)cosmθ0,5ptfor5pt0.1emm1. As is mentioned, it has been established in Zhao and Hu 10 that there exists a bound E 2 > 0, when 0 < ϵ < E 2 , we have () to be true for each m ≥ 2.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In order to prove 𝜇 = 𝜇 1 is a bifurcation point, it is required to verify the four conditions of the Crandall-Rabinowitz theorem at this point. First of all, the differentiability of the map ℱ follows the same argument as in the papers, 10,23,25,29,30 and the condition (1) in the Crandall-Rabinowitz theorem is naturally satisfied. For the remaining conditions, we need to prove…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very recently, Wu-Xu [22] analyzed the model (1.1)-(1.5) with (1.3) replaced by the boundary condition (1.10), and complete existence, uniqueness and stability results were given. Finally, for other related study, we refer the reader to [2,3,6,7,10,14,16,19,24] and the references cited therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the early biomechanical models of avascular tumor growth proposed by Greenspan [14], the bifurcation analysis [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], numerical simulations, and computational modeling [23,24,25,26,27,28,29] have contributed significantly to the tumor modeling area. Recently, tumor growth models with a necrotic core have also been developed and analyzed via the bifurcation theory [30,31,32,33,34,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%