2021
DOI: 10.3150/20-bej1243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary subspace analysis of nonstationary covariance processes: Eigenstructure description and testing

Abstract: Stationary subspace analysis (SSA) searches for linear combinations of the components of nonstationary vector time series that are stationary. These linear combinations and their number define an associated stationary subspace and its dimension. SSA is studied here for zero mean nonstationary covariance processes. We characterize stationary subspaces and their dimensions in terms of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of certain symmetric matrices. This characterization is then used to derive formal statistical tests… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figures show that VC method performs better than DSSA even "locally" for most values of u under measure D 2 whereas DSSA performs better under measure D 1 . Analogous figures for Models 2-4 can be found in Sundararajan et al (2019). The results are similar to Figure 6, especially for larger sample sizes.…”
Section: Subspace Estimation Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The figures show that VC method performs better than DSSA even "locally" for most values of u under measure D 2 whereas DSSA performs better under measure D 1 . Analogous figures for Models 2-4 can be found in Sundararajan et al (2019). The results are similar to Figure 6, especially for larger sample sizes.…”
Section: Subspace Estimation Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is noted that DSSA always provides a lower estimate of d than the VC method. Similar plots for all 9 subjects can be found Sundararajan et al (2019) Table 3: Left: Out-of-sample classification accuracy (in %) for the 3 subjects S3, S5 and S8 for the two indicated methods with p = 5. Right: Out-of-sample classification accuracy (in %) for 3 subjects S3, S5 and S8 corresponding to d= 7, 9, 11, and 13 for the VC method with p = 22.…”
Section: Application To Bci and Eeg Datamentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The next goal in the data analysis is to estimate the epoch-evolving dimension and the latent stationary time series where . In Figure 4 , we apply SSA and plot the estimates of the stationary subspace dimension across epochs using the method in Sundararajan et al [ 22 ].…”
Section: Analysis Of Complexity Of Rat Local Field Potentials In Amentioning
confidence: 99%