2017 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/mmsp.2017.8122244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis and directional coding of layer-based HDR image coding residue

Abstract: Existing methods for layer-based backward compatible high dynamic range (HDR) image and video coding mostly focus on the rate-distortion optimization of base layer while neglecting the encoding of the residue signal in the enhancement layer. Although some recent studies handle residue coding by designing function based fixed global mapping curves for 8-bit conversion and exploiting standard codecs on the resulting 8-bit images, they do not take the local characteristics of residue blocks into account. Inspired… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in Section II A), we do not take JPEG XT profile D into consideration, so we compare our method with profiles A, B, C. They are implemented by JPEG XT working group [25], and the recommended parameters are used in our experiments. Besides that, we compare our method with other state-of-the-art work, such as Choi et al [10], Wei et al [26], and Feyiz et al [27]. HDR-VDP-2 [24] and SSIM [28] are adopted as the evaluation metric of objective quality.…”
Section: D) Comparison With Jpeg Xt and Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned in Section II A), we do not take JPEG XT profile D into consideration, so we compare our method with profiles A, B, C. They are implemented by JPEG XT working group [25], and the recommended parameters are used in our experiments. Besides that, we compare our method with other state-of-the-art work, such as Choi et al [10], Wei et al [26], and Feyiz et al [27]. HDR-VDP-2 [24] and SSIM [28] are adopted as the evaluation metric of objective quality.…”
Section: D) Comparison With Jpeg Xt and Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(On the left is the original image, top two rows on the right are non-salient regions of reconstructed image, and two bottom rows on the right are salient ones. From left to right, the first row is original image, official implementation of JPEG XT profile A,B,C, the second row is Choi's method [10], Wei's method [26], Feyiz's method [27], and our proposed method, respectively.) of quality range.…”
Section: C O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%