1991
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.44.8.700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of comparison between laboratory methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These investigators also reported that in dietary validation studies more than 50% of participants must be correctly classified into tertiles, and that no more than 10% of participants should be grossly misclassified to be acceptable. Values between 0.61 and 0.80 are described as indication of good agreement, between 0.41 and 0.60 as moderate agreement, between 0.21 and 0.40 as fair agreement, and below 0.20 as poor agreement [23]. In this study we found that for total fat intake 51% of participants were correctly classified and for percent energy from fat 52% of participants.…”
Section: Iccsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…These investigators also reported that in dietary validation studies more than 50% of participants must be correctly classified into tertiles, and that no more than 10% of participants should be grossly misclassified to be acceptable. Values between 0.61 and 0.80 are described as indication of good agreement, between 0.41 and 0.60 as moderate agreement, between 0.21 and 0.40 as fair agreement, and below 0.20 as poor agreement [23]. In this study we found that for total fat intake 51% of participants were correctly classified and for percent energy from fat 52% of participants.…”
Section: Iccsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The kappa values for interobserver and intraobserver agreement were well above the value of 0.81 generally considered to show very strong agreement. 17 MF was identified in 21 percent of asymptomatic FAP patients, which is consistent with the previously reported incidence. 12 The identification of true desmoids in two asymptomatic patients was unexpected, although both became symptomatic within eight weeks of their CT scan.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This was assessed by calculating kappa for agreement as described by Altman. 17 When observers gave differing reports, the more abnormal report was used in data analysis.…”
Section: Ct Scan Scoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of the SRDM function to rule out SAS disorder or to detect SAS and its severity was assessed. Each patient was rated as no SAS, mild/moderate SAS, or severe SAS using PSG AHI and PM RDI separately, and the degree of agreement was assessed using an interrater agreement approach 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%