2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Analysis of Droplet Charge Acquired during Contact with Electrodes in Strong Electric Fields

Abstract: Aqueous droplets acquire charge when they contact electrodes in high-voltage electric fields. Although many researchers have investigated droplet charging under various conditions, the droplet charges are typically reported simply in terms of a mean and standard deviation. Here, we show that droplets often acquire significantly less charge for a single contact compared to the previous and subsequent contacts. These "low-charge events," which are not observed with charging of metal balls, yield up to a 60% decr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we observe undercharging during the majority of our experiments, especially at high electric field intensities. Similar undercharging events involving metallic particles and water droplets have recently been attributed to localized melting of the electrode surface at high current density and electrohydrodynamic instabilities that impede charge transfer [58,59]. Other effects such as nonuniform charge accumulation might also affect the particle charge and the electrostatic force between the particle and the electrode [22].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, we observe undercharging during the majority of our experiments, especially at high electric field intensities. Similar undercharging events involving metallic particles and water droplets have recently been attributed to localized melting of the electrode surface at high current density and electrohydrodynamic instabilities that impede charge transfer [58,59]. Other effects such as nonuniform charge accumulation might also affect the particle charge and the electrostatic force between the particle and the electrode [22].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In Figures 7 and S4, even if all the data is plotted, the velocity data is displayed along a single curve, confirming that there is no significantly lower charging event (see also Figures S5−S9, which show the velocity vs time graph of the data shown in Figure 5a.). Moreover, we were not able to observe the formation of various types of water bridges 18 but only a single Taylor cone bridge, as shown in Figure 6. (All photos near the electrode were examined to select the best picture in contact with the electrode for numerical simulation.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…One possible explanation for these different results from two studies covering the same droplet CCEP system is to use different types of electrodes. In the recent report, gold coated glass was used as the electrode, 18 but copper electrodes were used in this study. The imperfection of the gold coating or static electricity on the glass might affect the droplet charging, which can make significantly lower charging event or induce various shapes of bridge formation.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed we observed under-charging during the majority of our experiments, especially at high electric field intensities. Similar under-charging events involving metallic particles and water droplets have been recently attributed to localized melting of electrode surface at high current density and electrohydrodynamic instabilities which impede charge transfer [58,59]. Other effects such as nonuniform charge accumulation might also affect the particle charge and the electrostatic force between the particle and the electrode [57].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 79%