“…On the one hand, preliminary studies [38] reveal a proper conformance with Murakami’s empirical approach, but the present model does not invoke the defect size distribution itself. As presented in preliminary studies [39,40,41,42], the statistical distribution of flaw sizes can be evaluated by non-destructive investigation of the defect population, such as X-ray computed tomography scanning. However, the statistical distribution of the most extreme values evaluated from the XCT does not always represent the distribution of fatigue fracture initiating defects, due to the fact that cracks may initiate at the surface near heterogeneities even in the presence of larger flaws within the bulk volume (see [43,44,45]).…”