2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017ja024401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of MMS observations of energetic electron escape observed at/beyond the dayside magnetopause

Abstract: Observations from the Energetic Particle Detector (EPD) instrument suite aboard the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft show that energetic (greater than tens of keV) magnetospheric particle escape into the magnetosheath occurs commonly across the dayside. This includes the surprisingly frequent observation of magnetospheric electrons in the duskside magnetosheath, an unexpected result given assumptions regarding magnetic drift shadowing. The 238 events identified in the 40 keV electron energy channel d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
(203 reference statements)
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example of Cluster spacecraft trajectory during northern (a) and southern (d) cusp diamagnetic cavity crossings, respectively. (b, c, e, and f–i) MMS locations close to Southern Hemisphere magnetospheric boundaries calculated from T96 model in x , z GSM plane during electron leakage events observed by Cohen et al (). The interplanetary magnetic field vector in GSM coordinates during each leakage event is marked in each panel and distance between MMS to y = 0 plane is shown in bottom corner of each panel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Example of Cluster spacecraft trajectory during northern (a) and southern (d) cusp diamagnetic cavity crossings, respectively. (b, c, e, and f–i) MMS locations close to Southern Hemisphere magnetospheric boundaries calculated from T96 model in x , z GSM plane during electron leakage events observed by Cohen et al (). The interplanetary magnetic field vector in GSM coordinates during each leakage event is marked in each panel and distance between MMS to y = 0 plane is shown in bottom corner of each panel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Cluster trajectory during encounters of the "traditional" diamagnetic cavities (DMCs) at Northern (Nykyri, Otto, Adamson, Dougal, & Mumme, 2011) and Southern Hemispheres are shown for comparison. This shows that the MMS orbit can frequently encounter southern Cohen et al (2017). The interplanetary magnetic field vector in GSM coordinates during each leakage event is marked in each panel and distance between MMS to y = 0 plane is shown in bottom corner of each panel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Clearly, they were on the magnetosheath side of the ion diffusion region. They should not be leaked out from magnetosphere along the newly opened field lines (see Figure i), because of the following two reasons: If these electrons (1–4 keV) were from the magnetosphere, they should have pitch angles primarily in the antiparallel direction (Cohen et al, ) because MMS crossed the north part of the X‐line (see Figure i). However, this is not the case.…”
Section: Observation Of Energetic Electronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. If these electrons (1-4 keV) were from the magnetosphere, they should have pitch angles primarily in the antiparallel direction (Cohen et al, 2017) because MMS crossed the north part of the X-line (see Figure 1i). However, this is not the case.…”
Section: Observation Of Energetic Electronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zwan and Wolf, 1976;Wang et al, 2004), and as a function of the distance from the Sun-Earth line, with pronounced dawn-dusk asymmetries (see the reviews by Walsh et al, 2014;Dimmock et al, 2017, and references therein). One of the main sources of these dawn-dusk asymmetries is the bow shock, another one being the leakage of magnetospheric particles into the magnetosheath, which result in a dawn-dusk asymmetry of the energetic ion and electron components in the magnetosheath plasma (Anagnostopoulos et al, 2005;Cohen et al, 2017). In this paper, we concentrate on the impact of the bow shock properties on the large-scale distribution of the magnetosheath properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%