2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01285-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Analysis of R&D Funding in the Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These subsidies from the government are mainly used for training and development of scientists and engineers at research institutions which stimulate the private R&D. Gonzales and Pazo (2008) and Gorg and Strobl (2007) used matching propensity score for Spanish and Irish manufacturing firms, and also examined that firms with R&D subsidies and grants accelerate the private R&D. They found the complementary association between public and private R&D. 1 In addition, Lach (2002) conducted a panel study on Israeli manufacturing firms and found public R&D stimulate private R&D for small firms. Time series analysis used by Petkovova, Cadil, Mirosnik, and Rehak (2015) on Czech Republic firms showed positive association between public R&D and private R&D and suggested that private sector generate more innovation with government funded R&D programs in the 2010-2013 period. Concerning the services sector, the study of Czarnitzki and Fier (2001) also supported the complementary relationship between public and private R&D for German firms.…”
Section: Micro Level Evidencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These subsidies from the government are mainly used for training and development of scientists and engineers at research institutions which stimulate the private R&D. Gonzales and Pazo (2008) and Gorg and Strobl (2007) used matching propensity score for Spanish and Irish manufacturing firms, and also examined that firms with R&D subsidies and grants accelerate the private R&D. They found the complementary association between public and private R&D. 1 In addition, Lach (2002) conducted a panel study on Israeli manufacturing firms and found public R&D stimulate private R&D for small firms. Time series analysis used by Petkovova, Cadil, Mirosnik, and Rehak (2015) on Czech Republic firms showed positive association between public R&D and private R&D and suggested that private sector generate more innovation with government funded R&D programs in the 2010-2013 period. Concerning the services sector, the study of Czarnitzki and Fier (2001) also supported the complementary relationship between public and private R&D for German firms.…”
Section: Micro Level Evidencesmentioning
confidence: 99%