Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics - COLING '08 2008
DOI: 10.3115/1599081.1599114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical anaphora resolution in biomedical texts

Abstract: This paper presents a probabilistic model for resolution of non-pronominal anaphora in biomedical texts. The model seeks to find the antecedents of anaphoric expressions, both coreferent and associative ones, and also to identify discourse-new expressions. We consider only the noun phrases referring to biomedical entities. The model reaches state-of-the art performance: 56-69% precision and 54-67% recall on coreferent cases, and reasonable performance on different classes of associative cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The area of statistical anaphora resolution had been approached by computer linguists. Gasperin and Briscoe [8] applied an statistical approach for anaphora resolution in biomedical texts. They built a system which was based on the naive-Bayes classifier.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area of statistical anaphora resolution had been approached by computer linguists. Gasperin and Briscoe [8] applied an statistical approach for anaphora resolution in biomedical texts. They built a system which was based on the naive-Bayes classifier.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the work of (Castaño et al, 2002), (Gasperin and Briscoe, 2008), and (Gasperin, 2009) that resolved coreferential relations on certain restricted entities in the biomedical domain, we resolve all NP coreferential relations. Although the GENIA corpus contains 1,999 biomedical abstracts, Yang et al (2004) tested only on 200 abstracts under 5-fold cross validation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that there are large differences in reference phenomena between scientific text and other domains (Gasperin, 2009). In scientific text, it is assumed that the reader has a relatively high level of background.…”
Section: Annotation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolving anaphora in scientific text has only recently gained interest in the research community and focuses mostly on the biomedical domain (Gasperin, 2009;Batista-Navarro and Ananiadou, 2011;Cohen et al, 2010). Some work has been done for other disciplines, such as computational linguistics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation