2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical and analytical comparison of multi-criteria decision-making techniques under fuzzy environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For combining the abilities, ideas, and opinions of a decision-maker, the linguistic predicting is converted to fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy AHP improves the capacity of the decision-making manner in any observation than conventional AHP (Zamani-Sabzi et al, 2016). The geometric mean method proposed by Buckley (Buckley, 1985) was adopted to make a comparison between the features, to calculate the fuzzy number and final weight of each used element, the linguistic terms were expressed in different importance level as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For combining the abilities, ideas, and opinions of a decision-maker, the linguistic predicting is converted to fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy AHP improves the capacity of the decision-making manner in any observation than conventional AHP (Zamani-Sabzi et al, 2016). The geometric mean method proposed by Buckley (Buckley, 1985) was adopted to make a comparison between the features, to calculate the fuzzy number and final weight of each used element, the linguistic terms were expressed in different importance level as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main concept is that a certain degree of an element belongs to a fuzzy membership set. The membership degrees range from 0 (completely not belonging) to 1 (completely belonging) [36].…”
Section: Overview Of the Mamca Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to the use of the decision matrix, methods based on the dominant eigenvalue (Zamani‐Sabzi, King, Gard, & Abudu, ; Deng, Hu, Deng, & Mahadevan, ) could be used to compute weights. The reader is referred also to Shang, Zhang, and Cao (), where several alternative methods to find weights are described.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%