2005
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.r500005-mcp200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical and Computational Methods for Comparative Proteomic Profiling Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: The combined method of LC-MS/MS is increasingly being used to explore differences in the proteomic composition of complex biological systems. The reliability and utility of such comparative protein expression profiling studies is critically dependent on an accurate and rigorous assessment of quantitative changes in the relative abundance of the myriad of proteins typically present in a biological sample such as blood or tissue. In this review, we provide an overview of key statistical and computational issues … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
215
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
215
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, owing to the peptide sorting properties of the COFRADIC methodology, it is less likely that peptides with similar nominal mass are introduced at the same time by the LC-column. [12] In our case study data, described in the Section on COFRADIC Mass Spectra, only a few overlapping peptide peaks were observed. Exact quantification of the amount of overlapping peptides is difficult, as it requires visual inspection of the data.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, owing to the peptide sorting properties of the COFRADIC methodology, it is less likely that peptides with similar nominal mass are introduced at the same time by the LC-column. [12] In our case study data, described in the Section on COFRADIC Mass Spectra, only a few overlapping peptide peaks were observed. Exact quantification of the amount of overlapping peptides is difficult, as it requires visual inspection of the data.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Gel-free methods include 'shotgun' approaches using tryptic digests of complex sets of proteins, followed by peptide sequencing in a tandem mass spectrometer for identification (12). More recently, state-of-the-art liquid chromatographymass spectroscopy systems have been used to identify and track the relative abundance of thousands of proteins (12)(13)(14). Despite the rapid advances in proteomic technology, several areas continue to need improvement, particularly in the detection, quantification and identification of low-abundance proteins and assessment of protein distribution among cells and subcellular structures, as well as the characterization of posttranslational modifications.…”
Section: Proteomics: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not always practical to pursue validation of all candidate biomarkers identified during the discovery stage. Thus, it is important from both time and cost point-ofviews to establish parameters for scientifically rational, statistically sound, evidence-based selection or rejection of biomarker candidates 37,38,39 . Only the 'best' candidates should move forward into the validation stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%