1992
DOI: 10.1109/14.204870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical approach for determining breakdown voltage of gas-insulated cables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 4.3, the results of the K-S test indicate that LD serves better than the normal and Gumbel distributions for all of the values of the sweep voltages, except for 0 V and -150 V. Because of the successful performance of the 3PWD in self-restoring gas-insulated systems [6][7][8][9], LD is also compared with the 3PWD…”
Section: Likelihood Ratio Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Section 4.3, the results of the K-S test indicate that LD serves better than the normal and Gumbel distributions for all of the values of the sweep voltages, except for 0 V and -150 V. Because of the successful performance of the 3PWD in self-restoring gas-insulated systems [6][7][8][9], LD is also compared with the 3PWD…”
Section: Likelihood Ratio Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In self-restoring insulation systems using air, vacuum, or SF 6 , the type of impulse breakdown voltage distribution is generally assumed to follow either normal or Weibull distribution [6][7][8][9]. Vibholm and Thyregod assessed 4 different impulse breakdown distributions determined by the up-and-down test method: normal, logistic, 3PW, and Gumbel distributions (GDs).…”
Section: Determining the Distributions Of The Impulse Breakdown Voltamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations