2014
DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2014.979195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical assessment of biosimilarity based on the relative distance between follow-on biologics for binary endpoints

Abstract: A new three-arm parallel design was recently proposed to investigate the biosimilarity between a biological product and a reference product by using the relative distance. The purpose of this article is to extend their results to binary endpoints for three popular metrics: the risk difference, the log relative risk, and the log odds ratio. The relative distances based on the three metrics are defined, and corresponding test procedures are developed. The type I error rates and powers are investigated theoretica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For P b , we utilize method by Shin and Kang (2016) in which relative distances for binary endpoints are proposed as biosimilarity criterion. They take risk difference and log odds ratio as a component of relative distance.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For P b , we utilize method by Shin and Kang (2016) in which relative distances for binary endpoints are proposed as biosimilarity criterion. They take risk difference and log odds ratio as a component of relative distance.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this Section, type I error rate and power are investigated based on both measures ∆ and log α. Shin and Kang (2016) derived power function for binary endpoints; however, we deal with ordinal endpoints. For predefined margin δ ∆ > 0, if z α < δ ∆ /(σ ∆ / √ n 1 ), then type I error rate at…”
Section: Type I Error Rate and Power Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations