2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/811/1/49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STATISTICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN PORES AND SUNSPOTS BY USINGSDO/HMI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They related this to the changes in the relative fraction of small and large sunspots in each cycle (i.e., larger the fraction of large sunspots in selected solar cycle -steeper the H vs. S dependence for this cycle). (Kuklin, 1973(Kuklin, , 1980Nagovitsyn et al, 2012;Cho et al, 2015;Muñoz-Jaramillo et al, 2015;McClintock and Norton, 2016;Kostyuchenko, 2017;Nagovitsyn et al, 2018;Tlatov et al, 2019, and references therein). Nagovitsyn et al (2012) suggested that the two populations could represent the action of two spatially separated dynamos: one operating at the base/bulk of the convection zone, and the other -near the surface (see also, Clette and Lefèvre, 2012).…”
Section: Magnetic Flux Vs Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They related this to the changes in the relative fraction of small and large sunspots in each cycle (i.e., larger the fraction of large sunspots in selected solar cycle -steeper the H vs. S dependence for this cycle). (Kuklin, 1973(Kuklin, , 1980Nagovitsyn et al, 2012;Cho et al, 2015;Muñoz-Jaramillo et al, 2015;McClintock and Norton, 2016;Kostyuchenko, 2017;Nagovitsyn et al, 2018;Tlatov et al, 2019, and references therein). Nagovitsyn et al (2012) suggested that the two populations could represent the action of two spatially separated dynamos: one operating at the base/bulk of the convection zone, and the other -near the surface (see also, Clette and Lefèvre, 2012).…”
Section: Magnetic Flux Vs Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are smaller than the traditional sunspots. However, their magnetic field strength on the photospheric level can vary between 600 G to 1700 G, which approximately corresponds to the sunspot magnetic field strength (Sütterlin, Schröter, and Muglach, 1996;Giordano et al, 2008;Cho et al, 2015). Solar faculae are similar bright and small atmospheric features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hagenaar et al 2003). Therefore pores appear both near the sunspots and in isolation (Keil et al 1999), even though it seems that in the space of fundamental parameters, pores and sunspots depict distinct groups (Cho et al 2015) so one cannot simply say that a pore is a "small sunspot". Yet, it is believed that pores are manifestations of rising flux tubes in the same way as sunspots are.…”
Section: Purpose Of the Present Work And Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%